jueves, 18 de abril de 2013

Diary
April 14, 2013
Tours around Santa Cruz…
Knowing San Aurelio.



April 15, 2003
Talked about Avatar: them and we, professionals and non professionals, students and teachers,
Talked about a Lego-workshop in Arhus, Denmark where the proces atrackted more interest than the end-result.
Talked about Lusaka, Zambia and the compexity of the world.
About Australia and Indonesia.
Talked about the world in 2052 according to Jorgen Randers from Norway.
'No cities, no future!'
A lot of questions where posed, not answered…
Start up of a blog. 



April 16, 2013

Tuesday morning: four groups work on four locations and get different types of information
Tuesday afternoon: registering what has happened in the morning and noting it down meticously, after that presenting to the other groups, discussing it, and filtering out what is surprisingly interesting and what is not
Discussing homogenity in the four representations, both formally and contentwise
Agreements on similar looks in the presentations, in order to be able to compare and to relate to other groups




April 17, 2013

After presenting the process and outcome of each group on wednesday morning, the visual and recorded result of three of the four groups was drawn on one map.
And this map, originated from input from the real world outside the university, will act as a bible. All people that collaborated, have given their truth to the students.

Subsequently, the whole zone was divided into 7 sub-areas, including the adjacent neighbourhoods. Each zone will now be further develloped by two or three students, with total respect of the bible drawing.

In contrast to cooperation, collaboration is driven by complex realities rather than romantic notions of a common ground or commonality. It is an ambivalent process constituted by a set of paradoxical relationships between co-producers who affect each others.

There is more and more evidence that shows that working together may also happen in unexpected ways. Instead of exerting an alleged generosity of a group, where individuals are supposed to pursue solidarity, it may be the reverse: a brusque, in principle, ungenerous mode, where individuals are relying on each other the more they go after their own interests, mutually dependent through following their own agendas.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario